Mihar Singh
Kurali, 8 December
In the name of development in other areas including ward number 12 of the city, the case of scam of 62 lakhs is going on. After the matter was raised by AAP councilors and leaders, now the council president Ranjit Singh Jiti Padiala has held a press conference and said that they are acting under conspiracy and misleading the citizens. He also said that he is ready to file a defamation case regarding this matter and to face any punishment if found guilty. Kurali Municipal Council and District Congress President Ranjit Singh Jiti Padyala said that AAP councilors and leaders are misleading people by showing resolutions and estimates. He said that no bill has been passed and no payment has been made for the works for which he is being accused of fraud. Jiti Padyala said that 62 lakhs, if anyone can prove even six rupees, then they are ready to face any punishment. He said that they are being deliberately targeted to harm them politically.
Council president Jiti Padyala said that the Saharis are being misled by showing the paver blocks in the streets and talking about the bill payment scam, as per the instructions of the Supreme Court, manholes were first constructed by laying sewage pipelines in those streets. have gone He said that paver blocks could not be installed due to lack of money on sewage and man holes. He claimed that not a single interlock bill was found in the bills and no such payment was made to the contractor. The council president claimed that he has worked for the city with full honesty and diligence during his tenure while the opponents are deliberately targeting him. He also appealed to the citizens to avoid such misleading propaganda. On this occasion, Councilor Jaswinder Goldi, Ramkant Kalia, Paramjit Singh Pammi, Dinesh Gautam and others were also present with him.
Paying despite not completing work wrong: AAP leader
When contacted, AAP Councilor Bahadur Singh OK, Nandi Pal Bansal and Chairman Harish Kumar said that it is the responsibility of the contractor to complete the work mentioned in the tender and the payment and advance amount cannot be returned until the work is completed. He said that in the tender of the disputed streets, interlock tiles were also supposed to be installed besides other works and this work was not done.