Hearing on the demand to stop the release of ‘Udaipur files’ started, the court said- we do not want to come in the middle

New Delhi. The hearing has started on Wednesday on the demand for a ban on the release of Udaipur files film. Senior advocate Maneka Guruswami appeared on behalf of the accused petitioner. There itself. Senior advocate Gaurav Bhatia appeared towards the filmmaker. On behalf of senior advocate Kapil Sibal, the lawyer was requested to hear the hearing on August 1 at 2 pm.

The lawyer of the accused said that the filmmaker has clearly stated that the film is based on the charge sheet. The dialogues are taken directly from the charge sheet and I will talk in detail with the decision on it. On behalf of the petitioner accused Javed, senior advocate Maneka Guruswami said that 160 witnesses are yet to be investigated. The accused deserves fair trials under Article 21. The first argument is that due to the release of this film, the right of fair trial has been endangered.

Advocate Guruswami said that the right to fair trial is an essential component to be Indian in this country. The central government has used its revision power, which is a violation of the statutory scheme prescribed under the Cinematograph Act. Guruswami said that the final proposal is that the film and its producers are guilty of contempt of court, violating the principles of law and the major principle of justice administration.

The court said this during the hearing

Advocate Guruswami said that our judicial system is to reach the truth. For this, it is necessary that no partner is prejudiced in any way. Meanwhile, the Delhi High Court said that we do not want to come in the middle. We will examine the facts and content you presented. Nearly three proposals have not violated the right of fair hearing, but you have to make it clear what the contempt of the court really means?.