Washington: The fire in the forests of Los Angeles is causing havoc. The fire is leaving traces of destruction in its wake, following which conspiracy theories are also emerging on social media. People on social media point to the unusual pattern of the fire. People are especially pointing out the palm trees in front of the houses. He says that houses and cars were completely burnt to ashes but how can these palm trees remain safe. Questions are also being raised about the fire, whether it was intentionally set? Because the news is also that the California insurance company ‘Farm Insurance’ had canceled the policies of hundreds of houses in the Pacific Palisades area.
This is the same area that is now burning and people are in dire need of insurance. The insurance company said it made the move to protect itself from financial default given the increasing frequency and intensity of wildfires in the Golden State, Newsweek reported. The most prevalent conspiracy theory is that the attack was carried out by a ‘directed energy weapon’ (DEW), which led to the fire in the Los Angeles forest, media outlet Newstalk reported. Those who are expounding this theory believe that this is being done to establish a new type of city.
Houses burned but trees survived?
Conspiracy theorists are focusing people’s attention on palm trees. He is asking the question that the cars and houses were burnt but how come the trees were left standing. However, experts have answered these questions. He says palm trees survive forest fires because of their thick bark and high humidity. In addition, they say that in most forest fires, the heat is at the ground level, due to which the leaves present in these trees at higher altitudes are spared. Despite this, many trees are badly burnt.
The question raised by the Hollywood star
Due to this fire, Hollywood star Mel Gibson (69) has also suffered a great loss. His $15 million home in Malibu burned to the ground. He has revealed this in an interview. At the same time, he raised the question whether Governor Gavin Newsom and the California government could be involved in this disaster. Gibson, speaking to Fox News’ Laura Ingraham, raised questions about whether the fires were deliberately set to drive people away from the expensive property. He said that I can create various theories in my mind. But the most convenient thing is that there was no water during this disaster. Actually, while extinguishing the fire, it was found that there was no water in the fire hydrant.